Dossier

 

Cinema and thinking styles:
how movies can reveal aspects of personality

1. Individual differences

While the people who make up a film's audience certainly share some characteristics (for example, a preference for a film genre, for a particular director and/or performer, or for a particular theme), they undoubtedly show, as in any other area of experience, individual differences. Viewers differ more or less markedly in their previous knowledge of the film genre, their personal experiences and their beliefs and attitudes - all elements that then influence expectations, reactions and judgments about the film.

Individual differences, however, are also a fascinating field of exploration with respect to the concept of personality. After all, what makes us unique individuals depends on a variety of factors, some of which are biological and innate, while others are the result of the experiences we have gone through since the day we were born, including our socialization processes in the context of our culture. The "innate" and the "learned" are not two separate domains, but are inextricably linked in forging our special way of being unique (though this should not make us forget what makes us similar to each other).

Individual differences can be described and have been studied in various ways: for example, people are known to differ in their preferences for sensory modalities (some may be more visual, some more auditory, still others may prefer a kinesthetic approach, i.e. based on the use of the body and its movements). Or people may show different thinking styles (i.e. ways they prefer to process information in their minds - for example they may occupy an intermediate position between analytical and global, between reflective and impulsive) or different social attitudes (e.g. being more or less introverts rather than extroverts).

2. Thinking styles

The ways in which we process information in our minds vary from person to person to a greater or lesser extent.
Some people may tend towards an analytical style: they prefer to start from the parts to get to the whole, like to consider details, reason logically, willingly focus on the differences between things. Others, on the other hand, may tend towards a global style: they start from an overall vision and from the general context, organize the information more simultaneously, find it easy to make a synthesis, focus more willingly on the similarities between things.

People also differ in their tendency towards reflexivity: they carefully consider facts and possible options, make more objective judgments, require longer processing times. Others are more impulsive: they make decisions based on sensations and essential information, prefer to provide more immediate answers, make more subjective judgments.

And again, some can be more systematic: they organize information in a linear, sequential and cumulative way, don't like excessive or too varied inputs, are activated even by low intensity stimuli. Others, on the other hand, tend to be more intuitive: they love even complex and simultaneous inputs, are activated by more intense stimuli, which they manage in real time.

Finally, there are people who are more cautious, who tolerate less risks and the ambiguity of situations, compared to others who are more willing to take risks and who tolerate any ambiguity of contexts better.

3. Some important considerations

* The terms we have used to identify individual differences in thinking styles are absolutely neutral: there are no "better" or "worse" styles, let alone "ideal" styles. In fact, all styles can be effective depending on the situations, the contexts, the type of task we have to carry out. And knowing how to use different styles, that is, being more flexible in the ways of processing information, can in many cases be advantageous.

* Not all people show extreme thinking styles: it is not common to find people who are extremely analytical, or, on the contrary, extremely global. Indeed, many tend to be in an intermediate position between the extremes we have identified above, or to be more balanced than others. It is important to recognize the uniqueness of each profile of thinking styles: each of us is in fact the bearer of personality dimensions that make him a unique individual.

* Becoming more aware of one's thinking styles, as well as other dimensions of one's personality, can enable us to get to know ourselves better, to understand the reasons for some of our choices and behaviours, to identify our strengths and weaknesses. This self-knowledge allows us to respond less automatically and more consciously to the problems and challenges we face, increasing our flexibility and our resilience.

4. Cinema ... and a questionnaire to get to know oneself better

Our cinematic habits and attitudes, just like any other area of activity, can be a source of information about our own profile of thinking styles. The following questionnaire will help you do just that. Keep in mind that any questionnaire of this type can only give you a general indication of your profile - it should not be taken as a rigid and definitive "portrait" of some dimension of your personality - in other words, not a point of arrival but a starting point for further explorations. At the end of the questionnaire you will therefore be asked to observe the results critically and to use your knowledge of your behaviours, habits, attitudes, etc., to change or refine what appears to be your own personal profile.


N.B. To answer the questionnaire you can use a pdf version that you can download and/or print here.

Choose the answer that best represents you. Skim through the statements quickly, without thinking too much about them.
Remember that there are no right or wrong answers!

 

PART 1

Decide how each of the following statements applies to you personally. Circle the number in the appropriate column.


 

This is just like me

This is a bit like me

This is definitely not like me

1. To "get in touch" with a film I need some time and to see different scenes.

2

1

0

2. I don't like movies that end in a completely unexpected way.

2

1

0

3. I can't stand films at a very slow pace.

2

1

0

4. I feel the need to understand why a character behaves in a certain way.

2

1

0

5. I don't like movies where there are several intertwining stories.

2

1

0

6. I dislike movies (for example, crime/thrillers) where you have to pay attention to clues and details.

2

1

0

7. I like movies where what counts are action and movement.

2

1

0

8. I appreciate films that invite reflection and discussion.

2

1

0

9. I like characters to be well defined from the start.

2

1

0

10. I watch a movie even if I have read a bad review.

2

1

0

11. I don't like those plots where the end presents  some unclarified or unresolved points.

2

1

0

12. I appreciate movies where you have to pay close attention to the details of individual scenes.

2

1

0

13. I like movies that keep giving me strong emotions.

2

1

0

14. I like to focus on individual characters rather than the overall plot.

2

1

0

15. I tend to judge a character or get a good idea of her/him from the very first scenes.

2

1

0

16. I prefer films whose director and/or actors/actresses I know well and appreciate.

2

1

0

17. I don't like films with too complex plots, in which you have to follow even the smallest details.

2

1

0

18. If a movie ends in an ambiguous or unclear way, I'm still glad I saw it.

2

1

0

19. The first impressions I get of a character or situation are very important to me.

2

1

0

20. I prefer movies with a plot that develops clearly and logically.

2

1

0

21. I'm not happy if I haven't been able to fully understand all the developments of the plot.

2

1

0

22. I like movies whose genre is clear, for example a comedy, a drama, a n action movie ...

2

1

0

23. I prefer films in which, in addition to feeling emotions, one must also reflect.

2

1

0

24. If someone gives me a negative opinion of a movie, I'm unlikely to go and see it.

2

1

0

25. At the end of a film it is easy for me to say what its overall meaning is.

2

1

0

26. I quickly get a feel for the characters and how the story will unfold.

2

1

0

27. When I choose a film I don't give much weight to the name of the director and/or actors/actresses.

2

1

0

28. Before judging a character I expect to see her/him in action in many scenes.

2

1

0

29. I get easily carried away by the emotions of the story as a whole.

2

1

0

30. I prefer movies with lots of action and lots of movement.

2

1

0

31. I'm more involved in the story as a whole than in individual scenes.

2

1

0

32. I appreciate movies with an ending that surprises me.

2

1

0

33. I like movies whose plot develops gradually, step by step.

2

1

0

34. I notice and appreciate details such as costumes, sets, colors ...

2

1

0

35. I prefer films in which the personality of characters is clearly described.

2

1

0

36. I listen carefully to dialogues and monologues to better understand characters.

2

1

0

37. I find it easy to guess how the plot of a film will develop.

2

1

0

38. I appreciate a film as a whole, without paying attention to particular aspects such as acting, sets, music, etc.

2

1

0

39. I accept certain characters even if their personality or role in the film are not entirely clear.

2

1

0

40. I like movies that give me strong emotions.

 

2

1

0

 

 

PART 2

For each statement fill in one or two squares depending on your answers, always starting from the centre. Don't fill in any squares if you chose "0" as an answer.

For eample:

- if for the analytical style in statement 12 you have circled number 1, fill in the first square on the relevant line.

- if for the global style in statement 6 you have circled number 2, fill in the first two squares on the relevant line.

STATEMENTS

 ANALYTICAL

<------> GLOBAL STATEMENTS

12   14   21   34   36

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □

  □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 6   17   25   31   38

 

STATEMENTS THINKING STYLES STATEMENTS

 

     ANALYTICAL

<---->  GLOBAL  
12   14  21 34  36

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 6   17   25   31   38
REFLECTIVE <---->  IMPULSIVE

1   4   8   23   28

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □  3    7   13   29   30
SYSTEMATIC <----> INTUITIVE

5   9   20   33   35

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15   19   26   37   40
INTOLERANT of ambiguity and risk
<----> TOLERANT of ambiguity and risk

2   11   16   22 24 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □   □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 10   18   27   32   39

 

PART 3

 

Think about the results and, if you can, discuss them with someone: do you agree with the results of the questionnaire?


□ YES, because (give examples of your behaviors, habits, preferences, attitudes ...)
...……………………………………………………………….…………………………………..................................

□ NO, because (give examples of your behaviors, habits, preferences, attitudes ...)
..…………………….………………………………………………………………………………..……………............


□ Did you find this questionnaire useful? Do you think you've discovered something new or interesting?

............................................................................................................................................................................

 

Back to cinemafocus.eu Home page

info@cinemafocus.eu